Talk:Musicology

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Musicology article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 2 months

Philosophy: Aesthetics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Aesthetics

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Music theory Mid‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Music theory, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of music theory, theory terminology, music theorists, and musical analysis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Music theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Music theoryTemplate:WikiProject Music theoryMusic theory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Opera

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles

Evaluation

I think this article was on point and stayed relevant on the topic. I did not have any complaints or find anything out of order. I did have what seemed to be an ad. It was asking for me to donate money to keep wikipedia. 64.121.40.217 (talk) 04:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Musicology has a very strong opener that draws in readers that enjoy musical stuff very well. They keep the opener short, but keep it also extremely detailed, making the page look extremely neat. The only drawback to this article is that the sources are kind of dated, the most recent source was last updated in 2020. Considering the nieche topic that musicology is, its most likely not that big of a deal. The writing is extremely good, and the editors of this page have hyperlinked all of the musical terms that people outside of music wouldn't understand and define those terms for the average reader to grasp all of the context. The tone and balance of the article is very neutral, as there is not really any bias in music. Threre was only one comment in the talk section of the article, and it was kept very short and simple, but it correlates with my review stating that the article looks very good and stayed relevant to the topic at hand. There is minimal media shown throughout the article, however the media that is shown coorelates with the content, adding context to what is being stated. After reading this artice, i can tell that the writers and the editors of this article kept it very professional, and very informative, not straying from the topic ever. Saltcan (talk) 20:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]